Question to Homebuilders and Developers:
What thoughts come to mind when you think of a Homeowner's Assocation meeting? Do you think of axiety, anger, tomatoes, frustration, friction and burning torches? Probably. I've had those thoughts, too.
Last Thursday, I entered such a meeting.
But this one had the makings of being worse. I was about to inform the homeowners that the construction of the clubhouse and pool would be delayed indefinitely. Not permanently, mind you, but for the foreseable future. Financing of the clubhouse and pool had recently by de-funded by my construction lender leaving me with no choice but to postpone the December 2009 opening.
Not surprising, tensions rose; emotions erupted. Profanity ensued.
After a period of civil discussion (missing from our culture in every day America) something amazing happened. I mean AMAZING. A handful of homeowners offered to loan the money to pay for the clubhouse. Unbelievable.
Details haven't been worked out and I'm sure there will be a few. One thing is for sure: My business has a new Joint Venture. I couldn't be happier.
In these (economic) times, can you think of anyone you'd rather partner with than your customers?
Showing posts with label Epcon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Epcon. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
How Much Do You Charge for Integrity?
I know, it's a strange question.
But it seems to me that too many people are willing to compromise their integrity. In other words, people will discount their moral values to get the deal done, to please the boss, to avoid scrutiny. Some people don't even hide their intent.
You already knew that.
Here's the interesting part: I'm seeing this (lack of integrity) trend within prospective buyers of our homes. It's strange because I come from the school of thought that the buyer is always right. It occurs to me, though, that some buyers are only in the deal for themselves. There is no reciprocity.
Don't get me wrong. I respect the fact that people are looking out for themselves. Sometimes, you are all YOU have.
What I challenge is the immoral actions these buyers will take. For example, a prospective buyer who works with a buyer's agent (without a written agreement) for weeks in search of a new home only to then exclude the agent when the right (or wrong) home is chosen, hoping that the builder will slash the price even further. That's lack of integrity.
No doubt, the economy is wreaking havoc on our pocketbooks. It doesn't have to take a toll on our integrity.
At the end of the day, if you're only left with your integrity (and literally nothing else), you'll live a life worth living.
But it seems to me that too many people are willing to compromise their integrity. In other words, people will discount their moral values to get the deal done, to please the boss, to avoid scrutiny. Some people don't even hide their intent.
You already knew that.
Here's the interesting part: I'm seeing this (lack of integrity) trend within prospective buyers of our homes. It's strange because I come from the school of thought that the buyer is always right. It occurs to me, though, that some buyers are only in the deal for themselves. There is no reciprocity.
Don't get me wrong. I respect the fact that people are looking out for themselves. Sometimes, you are all YOU have.
What I challenge is the immoral actions these buyers will take. For example, a prospective buyer who works with a buyer's agent (without a written agreement) for weeks in search of a new home only to then exclude the agent when the right (or wrong) home is chosen, hoping that the builder will slash the price even further. That's lack of integrity.
No doubt, the economy is wreaking havoc on our pocketbooks. It doesn't have to take a toll on our integrity.
At the end of the day, if you're only left with your integrity (and literally nothing else), you'll live a life worth living.
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Are you a Kategadi
Last night, I (thought) I had the greatest idea. I was watching an episode of Property Virgins on HGTV and..............Wait a minute. I should probably clarify why I was watching HGTV at 9:00 on a Monday evening.
I recently attended a Jeff Shore sales training workshop (twitter.com/jeffshore) in Charlotte and he recommended that we watch HGTV (especially House Hunters) to see how real prospective home buyers search for, (think about) and purchase property. Hint: everybody compromises.
Anway, I saw the most awesome way to market your home. Take the market value of your home, slash the price 25% (and reduce that number by $100), and advertise the lower price. Instruct all prospective buyers they have one week to present any and all offers. Seems catchy, doesn't it? For example, your home's market value is $380,000. You decide to list it for $284,900. Seems like it could be the deal of a lifetime, right?
Hopefully, the pool of prospective buyers know that the $284,900 asking price will likely be met and exceeded since it is significantly below market value. Consequently, those "bidding" on the home during the one-week silent auction period will get caught up in the frenzy (because people assume other prospective buyers are doing the same). Assuming the home you are marketing isn't average, you might dupe the marketplace into paying more for your home than if you had just listed it for $380,000.
You've created urgency.
Those of us in home sales know how hard it is to create urgency (in today's market). It's as hard as shooting a 59 on a par-72.
But are you willing to commit yourself (and your company, and your employees, and your reputation) to schemes; gimmicks (e.g., Cash for Clunkers, $8,000 tax credit); distrustful techniques? Are you a Kategadi (Greek slang for scam artist)?
Or are you the consummate professional?
I recently attended a Jeff Shore sales training workshop (twitter.com/jeffshore) in Charlotte and he recommended that we watch HGTV (especially House Hunters) to see how real prospective home buyers search for, (think about) and purchase property. Hint: everybody compromises.
Anway, I saw the most awesome way to market your home. Take the market value of your home, slash the price 25% (and reduce that number by $100), and advertise the lower price. Instruct all prospective buyers they have one week to present any and all offers. Seems catchy, doesn't it? For example, your home's market value is $380,000. You decide to list it for $284,900. Seems like it could be the deal of a lifetime, right?
Hopefully, the pool of prospective buyers know that the $284,900 asking price will likely be met and exceeded since it is significantly below market value. Consequently, those "bidding" on the home during the one-week silent auction period will get caught up in the frenzy (because people assume other prospective buyers are doing the same). Assuming the home you are marketing isn't average, you might dupe the marketplace into paying more for your home than if you had just listed it for $380,000.
You've created urgency.
Those of us in home sales know how hard it is to create urgency (in today's market). It's as hard as shooting a 59 on a par-72.
But are you willing to commit yourself (and your company, and your employees, and your reputation) to schemes; gimmicks (e.g., Cash for Clunkers, $8,000 tax credit); distrustful techniques? Are you a Kategadi (Greek slang for scam artist)?
Or are you the consummate professional?
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
On the Road to Recovery. I DON'T CARE.
News flash: The Economy is on the Road to Recovery
As Dana Carvey (the Church Lady) used to say, "Well, isn't that special."
It sure would be nice to think that these "experts" are correct. Signs (as miniscule as they may be) of recovery and so-called 'green shoots' are apparently popping up across the economic landscape. The stock market is up; housing starts are up; the sky is still up.
On the other hand, one could make an argument that recovery, while eminent, is not upon us. There are even accusations that the media is falsely reporting signs of an economic recovery. Unemployment is growing; foreclosures are mounting; and Tiger just choked on a 54-hole lead in a Major.
Here's the cool part: I DON'T CARE.
I don't care because my plan isn't contingent on statistics or data. My future success isn't predicated on anyone other than ME and the energy I commit. Notwithstanding the support of my wife, my parents and siblings, my treasured employees, a few select friends and, of course, my bankers, I cannot (and will not) allow my energies to adjust like a thermometer depending on the latest news flash that makes me FEEL better (or worse) about being in business.
This is why you won't view me Twittering or emailing or regurgitating these economic statistics or fighting to save these useless government programs (see The Clunker Close blog) intended to spur economic activity.
Here's to being a thermostat.
As Dana Carvey (the Church Lady) used to say, "Well, isn't that special."
It sure would be nice to think that these "experts" are correct. Signs (as miniscule as they may be) of recovery and so-called 'green shoots' are apparently popping up across the economic landscape. The stock market is up; housing starts are up; the sky is still up.
On the other hand, one could make an argument that recovery, while eminent, is not upon us. There are even accusations that the media is falsely reporting signs of an economic recovery. Unemployment is growing; foreclosures are mounting; and Tiger just choked on a 54-hole lead in a Major.
Here's the cool part: I DON'T CARE.
I don't care because my plan isn't contingent on statistics or data. My future success isn't predicated on anyone other than ME and the energy I commit. Notwithstanding the support of my wife, my parents and siblings, my treasured employees, a few select friends and, of course, my bankers, I cannot (and will not) allow my energies to adjust like a thermometer depending on the latest news flash that makes me FEEL better (or worse) about being in business.
This is why you won't view me Twittering or emailing or regurgitating these economic statistics or fighting to save these useless government programs (see The Clunker Close blog) intended to spur economic activity.
Here's to being a thermostat.
Monday, August 10, 2009
What's in a Name
At EPCON Communities, we have 11 different floor plans (as far as I know) and each floor plan is given its own name. We have Aboreta, Bramante, Colonnade, Ducal, Abbey, Canterbury. We have Villa and Chateau and Portico and Promenade. Did I mention the Palazzo?
So, I was thinking. What's the point of all of these exotic and hard-to-spell names and why does every other brand marketer do the same thing?
Pulte (Sun City Carolina Lakes) has 23 different plan names! They have Kenwood, Brookside, Muirfield, Pine Spring, Copper Ridge, Surrey Crest, Willow Bend, Crestwood Meadow.............you get my point.
Actually, what is the point?
Take a look at General Motors (er, Government Motors). They have 8 different brands and each brand has its own model names. Chevy alone has the Aveo, Cobalt, Colorado, HHR, Silverado, Malibu, Camero, Impala, Equinox, Traverse, Avalanche, Tahoe, Suburban and Corvette. What the heck is a Traverse?
How much time (and energy.......and money) is spent coming up with these silly names when the same amount of time (and energy........and money) could be spent on product efficiency and quality control? I'll bet you GM (and Pulte) have employees whose main job description is naming each of the products they build.
I don't drive a BMW, but they've got cool car names: X6, Z3, 750, M5.
So, what's in a name?
So, I was thinking. What's the point of all of these exotic and hard-to-spell names and why does every other brand marketer do the same thing?
Pulte (Sun City Carolina Lakes) has 23 different plan names! They have Kenwood, Brookside, Muirfield, Pine Spring, Copper Ridge, Surrey Crest, Willow Bend, Crestwood Meadow.............you get my point.
Actually, what is the point?
Take a look at General Motors (er, Government Motors). They have 8 different brands and each brand has its own model names. Chevy alone has the Aveo, Cobalt, Colorado, HHR, Silverado, Malibu, Camero, Impala, Equinox, Traverse, Avalanche, Tahoe, Suburban and Corvette. What the heck is a Traverse?
How much time (and energy.......and money) is spent coming up with these silly names when the same amount of time (and energy........and money) could be spent on product efficiency and quality control? I'll bet you GM (and Pulte) have employees whose main job description is naming each of the products they build.
I don't drive a BMW, but they've got cool car names: X6, Z3, 750, M5.
So, what's in a name?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
